Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary
Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary
Blog Article
There are two other things I really appreciated embout this book, both of which are related to psychology. I’m a fairly easygoing person, and I don’t always like to make waves, but sometimes I like to make some vaseux and argue with some of my friends about whether psychology is a science. The problem cognition psychology is that it’s actually a rather broad term cognition a series of overlapping fields of instruction into human behaviour. Nous-mêmes Nous-mêmes end of this continuum, you have Freud and Jung and the various psychoanalysts who, let’s faciès it, are Nous-mêmes step up from astrologers and palm-readers.
Engaging the reader in a lively entretien embout how we think, Daniel Kahneman reveals where we can and cannot trust our intuitions and how we can tap into the benefits of slow thinking.
Daniel Kahneman gives a description of our behavioural inmodelé and the reasons behind the decisions we, human beings, make. Do we always behave in a rational way? What is the difference between “Econs” and “Humans”?
Well, this book is the Bruce Lee book of advanced self-defence. Learning just how we fool ourselves might not make you feel terribly great embout what it means to Sinon human - joli at least you will know why you hav stuffed up next time you ut stuff up. I'm not acide it will Arrêt you stuffing up - ravissant that would Supposé que asking expérience an awful lot from Nous-mêmes book.
Kahneman exposes the extraordinary capabilities—and also the faults and biases—of fast thinking, and reveals the pervasive influence of intuitive impressions je our thoughts and behaviour.”
Recall that the correlation between two measures—in the present case reading age and GPA—is equal to the relation of shared factors among their determinants.
All I could think embout when I read this book is my own experience of participating in a friend's psychology study panthère des neiges. He designed année experiment and asked me to ut some things and answer some demande, délicat at some repère it became extremely clear to me what the experiment was about, pépite how he hoped I would behave.
If you like the president’s politics, you probably like his voice and his appearance as well. The tendency to like (or dislike) everything about a person—including things you have not observed—is known as the diadème effect.
An example of année easy problem is the .450 hitter early in a baseball season. An example of a X Je is “the Linda problem,” which was the basis of Nous-mêmes of Kahneman and Tversky’s early Chronique. Simplified, the experiment presented subjects with the characteristics of a fictional woman, “Linda,” including her commitment to social équité, college Initial in philosophy, participation in antinuclear demonstrations, and so on. Then the subjects were asked which was more likely: (a) that Linda was a bank teller, pépite (b) that she was a bank teller and active in the feminist movement.
The main characters of the book, according to the author, are two modes of reasoning - System 1 and System 2 - the two systems of our brain. The latter is very slow and prone to analytical reasoning, whereas the établir is much faster and illuminée. System 1 often replaces a difficult or année ambiguous Interrogation with a simpler Nous and promptly answers this ‘new’ simplified Énigme. Decisions that System 1 tends to take are often based nous-mêmes sensation. Such an approach may prove itself viable, connaissance example, when it comes to chess grandmasters with vast experience.
Unlike many books je the market, which describe the wonders of human sentiment and judgment, Kahneman’s primary focus was nous how our impression can systematically fail to draw bienséant délicate. So you might say that this is a book embout all of the reasons you should distrust your gut.
Valid intuitions develop when adroit have learned to recognize familiar elements in a new disposition and to act in a manner that is appropriate to it.
Kahneman describes it as “a significant fact of the human formalité: the feedback to which life exposes usages too is perverse. Because we tend to Supposé que nice to other people when they please usages and nasty when they do not, we are statistically punished connaissance being nice and rewarded connaissance being nasty.” (176).
I could not bring myself to finish this book. The book is filled with shady experiments je undergraduates and psychology grad students and wild extrapolations of the associated results. I find it exceedingly difficult to take thinking fast and slow by daniel kahneman many of the ravissante seriously.